CO129-193 - Governor Hennessy - 1881 [5-7] — Page 372

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

368

done by Captain Thomsett, the Marine Magistrate, who reported that Mr. Coughtrie's claim of $1,500.

6.

was entitled to his original

As the Executive Council, and the Finance Committee have concurred in the justice of this vote, I recommend Your Lordship sanction it.

7.

to

Unfortunately Mr. Price complicated the question by charging Mr. Coughtrie with being guilty of personal abuse of the Surveyor General, (and he (Mr. Price) also attributed motives to Colonel Stuart in the advice he gave as a Member of my Council (when in command of the Troops) and in the professional opinion he expressed on a further reference of the papers to him on a unanimous vote of the Executive Council.

8.

I believe there was no ground for Mr. Price's insinuation against Colonel Stuart.

Some delay

9.

and misconception.

seems also to have arisen from the unfortunate fact that Mr. Price, who was Acting Colonial Secretary for a short time, when the case was before the Executive Council, did not send to Mr. Coughtrie the whole of the extracts from his own and other Survey Office reports on the Case

Edit History

2026-05-22 10:58:54 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
368 done by Captain Thomsett, the Marine Magistrate, who reported that Mr. Coughtrie's claim of $1,500. 6. was entitled to his original As the Executive Council, and the Finance Committee have concurred in the justice of this vote, I recommend Your Lordship sanction it. 7. to Unfortunately Mr. Price complicated the question by charging Mr. Coughtrie with being guilty of personal abuse of the Surveyor General, (and he (Mr. Price) also attributed motives to Colonel Stuart in the advice he gave as a Member of my Council (when in command of the Troops) and in the professional opinion he expressed on a further reference of the papers to him on a unanimous vote of the Executive Council. 8. I believe there was no ground for Mr. Price's insinuation against Colonel Stuart. Some delay 9. and misconception. seems also to have arisen from the unfortunate fact that Mr. Price, who was Acting Colonial Secretary for a short time, when the case was before the Executive Council, did not send to Mr. Coughtrie the whole of the extracts from his own and other Survey Office reports on the Case
Baseline (Original)
>> 368 done by baptain Thomsett, the Marine Magistrate, who reported that Mr boughtric claim of $1,500. 6. was entitled to his original As the Executive Council, and the Finance Committee have concurred in the justice of this vote, I recommend Your Lordship sanetion it. 7. to Unfortunately Mr Price complicated the question by charging Mr. Coughtrie with being guilty of personal abuse of the Surveyor General, (and he (Mr. Price) also attributed motives to bolonel Stuart in the me as a advice he gave of my Council (when Member (when in com in command of 6.3 6.gi 76.117 125 15 159 of the Troops) and in the professional opinion he expressed on a further reference of the papers to him on a unanimous vote of the Executive bouncil. 8. I believe there was no ground for Mr. Price's insinuation against bolonel Stuart. Some delay 9. and misconception. seems also to have arisen from the unfortunate fact that Mr. Price, who was Acting bolonial an Secretary for a short time, when the case was before the Excentive bonneil, did not send to Mr. boughtrie the ~ his own 7 whole of the extracts from and other survey Office reports on the Case
2026-05-22 10:58:54 · Baseline
View content

>>

368

done by baptain Thomsett, the Marine Magistrate, who reported that Mr boughtric claim of $1,500.

6.

was entitled to his original

As the Executive

Council, and the Finance Committee

have concurred in the justice of this vote, I recommend Your Lordship

sanetion it.

7.

to

Unfortunately Mr Price

complicated the question by charging Mr. Coughtrie with being guilty of personal abuse of the Surveyor General, (and he (Mr. Price) also attributed motives to bolonel Stuart in the

me as a

advice he gave of my Council (when

Member

(when in com

in command

of

6.3

6.gi

76.117

125

15

159

of the Troops) and in the professional

opinion he expressed

on a

further

reference of the papers to him on a unanimous vote of the Executive

bouncil.

8.

I believe there was no

ground for Mr. Price's insinuation

against bolonel Stuart.

Some delay

9.

and

misconception.

seems also to have

arisen from the unfortunate fact that Mr. Price, who was

Acting bolonial an

Secretary for a short time, when the

case was

before the Excentive bonneil, did not send to Mr. boughtrie the ~

his

own

7 whole of the extracts from

and other survey Office reports

on the

Case

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.